Smyczynski v. Goeseke
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- A. Gary Fieger v. Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation, Pitney Bowes Real Estate Financing Corporation and Prefco Xxii Limited Partnership (2d Cir. 2001)
- Sholom & Zuckerbrot Realty Corp. v. 101 Fleet Place Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Bersani v. Basset (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Briggs v. Rector (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The record reveals sufficient evidence to support a finding that plaintiff brought the parties together on the sale of defendants’ farm. All a broker need do to establish a prima facie case is introduce evidence tending to show the existence of a commission agreement and that he has procured a ready, willing and able purchaser at the price and terms of the seller. These are all questions of fact and as such must be resolved by the jury {Lane—Real Estate Dept. Store v Lawlet Corp., 28 NY2d 36, 44; Gallinger Real Estate v Mufale Dev. Corp., 53 AD2d 1014, 1015), as is the question of whether the broker was the procuring cause of sale. A finding that a broker’s efforts were the procuring cause of a sale, especially when that finding is based upon the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.