Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Fritz
Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Fritz
89 A.D.2d 991
Opinion of the Court
On the court’s own motion, the decision and order (both dated September 7, 1982) in the above-captioned matter are amended nunc pro tunc so that the decretal paragraph reads as follows: Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by providing that there shall be a recomputation of the amount due Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.