In re Rose Marie M.
Opinion of the Court
— On the court’s own motion, its decision, dated November 15, 1982 [90 AD2d 810], is amended by striking therefrom, the first paragraph on page 2 commencing with the words, “We note that * * * ” and terminates with “(subd 3, par [g])” and by substituting therefore the following: “We note that the same due process deficiency permeated the former comparable provisions of section 384-b of the Social Services Law in force at the time the fact finding adjudications in the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.