Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs’ complaint sets forth three causes of action. The first seeks an order setting aside a judgment incorporating a settlement agreement entered into among all defendants. The agreement allocated certain available replacement power. The second cause of action seeks an order “enjoining and mandating” defendants Niagara Mohawk and the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) to sell plaintiffs an equitable portion of the power which was the subject of the settlement agreement, and other power which may become available in the future. The third cause of action seeks money damages against Niagara Mohawk and PASNY for their failure to allocate power to plaintiffs ' over the last six years. The industrial defendants which were parties to the settlement agreement moved to dismiss the first and second causes of action. PASNY moved to dismiss the first cause of action only, while the City of
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.