Schachner v. Sikowitz
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rubin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Quick v. Quick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Jianqiu Xia v. Finnie (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- American Cancer Socy., Inc. v. Ashby (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Cyngiel v. Krigsman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Rozenberg v. Perlstein (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Manning-Kranes v. Manning-Franzman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Meagher v. Doscher (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Suissa v. Baron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Suissa v. Baron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Breslin Realty Development Corp. v. Shaw (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Gosine v. Sahabir (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Board of Managers of Nob Hill Condominium Section II v. Board of Managers of Nob Hill Condominium Section I (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Board of Managers of Nob Hill Condominium Section II v. Board of Managers of Nob Hill Condominium Section I (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Natoli v. Milazzo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Vardaris Tech, Inc. v. Paleros Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- North Fork Preserve, Inc. v. Kaplan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Friedman v. Ragin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Modern Collection Associates, Inc. v. Capital Group, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Chalos v. Chalos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract, defendants appeal as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered February 7, 1983, which, inter alia,, granted that part of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for the appointment of a temporary receiver. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion insofar as it was for the appointment of a temporary receiver denied. The appointment of a temporary receiver is an extreme remedy resulting in the taking and withholding of possession of property from a party without an adjudication on the merits {Hahn v Garay, 54 AD2d 629). Therefore, it is to be granted only where the applicant makes “a clear evidentiary showing of the necessity for the conservation of property and the protection of the interests of the litigant” {Glassner v Kaufman, 19 ÁD2d 885; see, also, Shapiro v Ostrow, 46 AD2d 859). The general accusations set forth by the plaintiffs have not sufficiently established by clear and convincing evidence the need for such a drastic remedy. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.