People v. Browne
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), rendered April 14, 1983, convicting him of manslaughter in
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant’s guilt was established by direct as well as circumstantial evidence that was sufficient to eliminate all innocent hypotheses (People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 202). The evidence included a statement defendant made to a detective on the telephone, essentially admitting that he stabbed the victim. A proper foundation was laid for introduction of this statement, upon which the jury could conclude that defendant was the speaker (People v Lynes, 49 NY2d 286, 291-292). Defendant was not in custody and, in any event, volunteered the inculpatory statement; hence no Miranda warnings were required (Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 478; People v Rodney P., 21 NY2d 1).
We have examined defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.