Jacobson v. Leaseway of Eastern New York, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Creed v. United Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Unifirst Corp. v. Gaslin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Troy Savings Bank v. American Equity Funding, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Thomas v. Small (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Gkanios v. Siembab (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— In two actions arising out of the same motor vehicle accident, to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death, Leaseway of Eastern New York, Inc., Glen Mohawk Dairy, Inc., and Arthur T. Schuster, defendants in both actions, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered September 7, 1983, as, upon their motion (1) for a joint trial of the actions and (2) to place the venue of the actions in Schenectady County, rather than Westchester County, where action No. 1 is pending or Kings County, where action No. 2 is pending, directed that the actions be jointly tried in the Supreme Court, Kings County.
Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellants against plaintiff-respondent Bienstock in action No. 2, that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to place the venue of the actions to be jointly tried in Schenectady County granted, and the place of trial of both action No. 1 and action No. 2 is changed to the Supreme Court, Schenectady County.
Special Term abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion for a change of venue to Schenectady County as that is the location where the accident occurred, where the majority of the nonparty material witnesses reside, and where the calendar is less congested (see Ray v Beauter, 90 AD2d 988). We further find that appellants’ motion was made within a reasonable period of time after commencement of the actions (CPLR 511, subd [a]). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Brown JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.