Macklin v. Powell
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Velger v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Davis v. New York State Division of Military & Naval Affairs (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Munich v. City of Lackawanna Department of Public Safety (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Van Dyke v. New York State Department of Education (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Saulpaugh v. Diehl (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Jessamy v. Fernandes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Sepulveda v. Long Island State Park & Recreation Commission (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered November 15, 1983 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondents to reinstate petitioner to his position in the Human Resources Management Group of the State Department of Health or, in the alternative, to afford petitioner a hearing.
Petitioner asserts (1) that his termination was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion and effectuated in bad faith, and (2) that the officer who discharged him acted without authority. Special Term dismissed the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We concur with that decision.
A probationary employee may be terminated without reasons and without a hearing (De Salvo v Kolb, 54 AD2d 991). Our review of such termination is limited to an inquiry as to whether it was made in bad faith and was, therefore, arbitrary and capricious (Matter of King v Sapier, 47 AD2d 114, affd 38 NY2d 960). The burden of proof in that regard is upon petitioner. Petitioner has failed to meet that burden. The record discloses
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.