Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985

Dolin v. Passero-Scardetta Associates

Dolin v. Passero-Scardetta Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 5, 1985
110 A.D.2d 1051; 489 N.Y.S.2d 21; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48927
Dolin v. Passero-Scardetta Associates

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

It is well settled that where, as here, an order imposes costs on the moving party as a condition of granting the relief sought, the acceptance and retention of the costs by the adverse party operates as a waiver of the right to appeal (see, e.g., Gray v Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co., 93 AD2d 998; Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Franklin — Eden Transp. Sys.], 87 AD2d 594; Gohery v Spartan Concrete Corp., 85 AD2d 678, affd 56 NY2d 785; N & J Foods v Shopwell Plaza Corp., 63 AD2d 899; Witz v Renner Realty Corp., 55 AD2d 517; Coleman v Padgett, 35 AD2d 695; Turntables, Inc. v M.B. Plastics Corp., 33 AD2d 899; P.H.C., Inc. v Wolf, 24 AD2d 769; James v Powell, 24 AD2d 428). It is on that basis that we dismiss the appeal. Were we to address the merits, however, we would affirm (see, N & J Foods v Shopwell Plaza Corp., supra; Coleman v Padgett, supra). Defendants’ showing of excusable default and merit was sufficient to justify Special Term’s exercise of discretion to relieve defendants from the default “upon such terms as may be just” (CPLR 5015 [a]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Davis, J. — vacate default judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.