Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 13, 1985

111 A.D.2d 264; 489 N.Y.S.2d 535; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51386

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Vandenburg (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
People v. Corbett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
People v. Loomis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
People v. Esposito (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Vientos (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. Hampton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
People v. Perez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
People v. Funchess (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
People v. Cardenas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
People v. Domond (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cooperman, J.), rendered July 15, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant seeks reversal of the instant judgment solely in the event we were to reverse a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered January 11, 1982. Defendant contends that a reversal of the foregoing, unrelated judgment would warrant a reversal of the instant judgment because the plea herein “[w]as taken in reliance on the prior conviction”. In light of our disposition of the appeal from the prior judgment (People v Jones, 111 AD2d 264 [No. 44]), there is concededly no basis for a reversal of the judgment herein (see, People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369). In any event, defendant’s contention is without merit (see, People v Lowrence, 41 NY2d 303). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.