Yassky v. Raytheon Co.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered November 23, 1984, which granted plaintiff’s motion to impose sanctions upon defendants-appellants for failure to comply with a notice of discovery and inspection as modified by a prior order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered July 17,1984, and which granted defendants-appellants’ cross motion for reargument and renewal of said prior order, to the extent of striking certain items from plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection and directing defendants-appellants to comply with those demands not stricken, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to reinstate item No. 1 of the notice of discovery and inspection and direct defendants-appellants to comply therewith within 90 days of the date of this court’s order, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff suffered burns over 65% of her body as a result of an accident involving her use of a stove, and she has brought the underlying action alleging three causes of action in products liability against, inter alia, the manufacturers and designers of the stove, the defendants-appellants herein. Plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection at issue, dated June 1, 1984, seeks information concerning various aspects of the gas ranges manufactured by the defendants-appellants. Item No. 1 seeks data regarding the pilotless ignition control devices incorporated in these gas ranges; item No. 4 seeks similar data regarding the
We have reviewed the other points raised by all parties on this appeal and cross appeal and find them without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Elíerin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.