Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985

People v. Watson

People v. Watson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 3, 1985
111 A.D.2d 774; 490 N.Y.S.2d 33; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50028
People v. Watson

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

  • People v. Glenn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
  • People v. Kolb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), rendered June 10, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

While we condemn the statement made by the prosecutor during summation that: “The [complaining witness] is a Black male. The defendant is a Black male. I submit to you there is no bias or prejudice in this case” (see, People v Green, 89 AD2d 874; People v Hearns, 18 AD2d 922; McFarland v Smith, 611 F2d 414; see also, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35), since defense *775counsel did not object to the statement, the error is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, e.g., People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818). Moreover, we have examined the entire record and conclude that defendant received a fair trial. Therefore, there is no basis for reversal in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.