Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985

In re Fritz

In re Fritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 20, 1985
113 A.D.2d 366; 496 N.Y.S.2d 315; 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52381

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, David E. Brennan for petitioner., Condon, LaTona & Pieri (John W. Condon, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

In re Fritz

Opinion of the Court

*367OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 12, 1977. Petitioner commenced this proceeding to suspend respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.23 (b) and to stay all pending disciplinary proceedings. The answer submitted on behalf of the respondent indicates that he has no objection to the relief sought.

Based on the pleadings and the medical evidence submitted we find that respondent is incapacitated from practicing law. Therefore, the petition is granted, respondent is suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this court and all pending disciplinary proceedings against him are stayed.

Dillon, P. J., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.