Allen v. City of Poughkeepsie Planning Board
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review certain actions taken
Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Upon a careful review of the record, we conclude that the Planning Board, as lead agency, reasonably exercised its discretion in issuing a declaration that the proposed construction would have no significant effect on the environment, thus obviating the need for an environmental impact statement (Southampton Assn, v Planning Bd., 109 AD2d 204, 206).
We have reviewed petitioners’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.