Moore v. Bamaco Group America, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, Catherine Moutoussis, Brita L. Mavroyanis and Dorothy A. Mavroyanis appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated December 12, 1983, as, upon reargument, denied their motion, inter alia, to vacate a prior judgment confirming said award.
Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Appellants contend that the arbitrators exceeded their power and issued a totally irrational award. We find this contention unpersuasive. The instant arbitration clause was extremely broad, giving the arbitrators the power to settle any dispute arising out of the terms of a stockholders’ agreement. Since this case involved a dispute over a mortgage payment provision contained within said agreement, it is clear that the arbitrators acted within their power in interpreting the provision. Because the arbitration clause contained no express or implied limitation upon the remedial power of the arbitrators, it cannot be said that they exceeded their power in issuing the instant award (see, Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 61 NY2d 913).
Moreover, the award itself is not a totally irrational inter
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.