People v. Carmello
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.), rendered July 19, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The court is not obligated to make reference to the presentence report on the record, and the law mandates only that it receive the presentence report before pronouncing sentence (CPL 390.20 [1]; People v Grice, 64 AD2d 718). The record indicates that the presentence report was prepared and sent to the court and defendant did nothing to refute the presumption of timely receipt. The report recommended that defendant be sentenced to a period of incarceration. Moreover, the sentence imposed was negotiated by defendant and represents the minimum permitted by law.
Defendant’s contention that the People and the court neglected to follow statutorily mandated procedures for sentencing him as a second violent felony offender (CPL 400.15) is without merit. Where the statutory purposes for filing a predicate statement (i.e., apprising the court of the prior conviction and affording defendant notice and an opportunity
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.