Griffith v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau of State Department of Motor Vehicles
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Ballen v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 (d) (1) is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed (see, Matter of McKenzie v Fisher, 39 NY2d 103; Matter of Rores v Passidomo, 109 AD2d 1066). Although petitioner testified that
Further, the testimony of the Deputy Sheriff as to the functioning of the traffic-control signal was not based on hearsay and his accident report was admissible in evidence (see, Matter of Ray v Blum, 91 AD2d 822, 823). Since the witness Joh was examined before the Administrative Law Judge and cross-examined by petitioner, any error in previously admitting into evidence his written statement must be deemed harmless. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mastrella, J.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.