Sterngass v. Cember
Opinion of the Court
—In an action for indemnification, defendant
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Plaintiffs’ action for indemnification was not time barred since it was instituted after payment was made but before the applicable six-year Statute of Limitations had run (see, Bay Ridge Air Rights v State of New York, 44 NY2d 49, 54-55; State of New York v Stewart’s Ice Cream Co., 64 NY2d 83). Moreover, plaintiffs’ suit was not barred by laches, since plaintiffs were not guilty of delay which prejudiced defendant (see, Sorrentino v Mierzwa, 25 NY2d 59, 63). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.