Newman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Yorktown
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Yorktown, dated November 2, 1984, which granted the application of the respondent Solomon Silver for a variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), dated March 15, 1985, which dismissed the petition.
Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The decision of a zoning board will be sustained if it has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441; Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591). A local zoning board of appeals has considerable discretion in considering an application for a variance and a court’s function is limited to setting aside its determination only where the record reveals illegality, arbitrariness or an abuse of discretion (see, Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 40 NY2d 309; Matter of Marasco v Luney, 99 AD2d 492).
In the instant proceeding, it was necessary for the respondent Solomon Silver to demonstrate that strict compliance
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.