In re Grey
Opinion of the Court
We are not persuaded that the various factors now advanced by respondent warrant setting aside his default or modification of the discipline previously imposed.
Accordingly, respondent’s motion is denied. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
Opinion of the Court
By decision and order dated June 13, 1986, this court granted the motion of petitioner Committee on Professional Standards for a default judgment in this disciplinary proceeding, found respondent guilty of the misconduct alleged in the petition and suspended him for a period of one year commencing July 14, 1986 (Matter of Grey, 122 AD2d 626).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.