Hebert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Opinion of the Court
Punitive damages may be recovered even though only private rights are involved (see, Keen v Keen, 113 AD2d 964, 965-966, lv dismissed 67 NY2d 646). However, they are not award-able for an isolated transaction incident to a legitimate business, such as a breach of an insurance contract, even a breach committed willfully and without justification; accordingly, even if the allegations of the complaint herein are proven, a punitive damage award would be unwarranted (see, Home Ins. Co. v Karantonis, 124 AD2d 368; Marsch v Massachusetts Indem. & Life Ins. Co., 101 AD2d 952, 953, lv dismissed 63 NY2d 769). Furthermore, to recover on account of defendant’s purported bad faith, plaintiff was obliged to make an extraordinary showing of a disingenuous or dishonest failure by defendant to carry out its contract (see, Gordon v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 30 NY2d 427, 437, cert denied 410 US 931; see also, Royal Globe Ins. Co. v Chock Full O’Nuts, 86 AD2d 315, lv dismissed 58 NY2d 800). That showing was not made.
Order reversed, on the law, without costs, motion granted and plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.