In re Weinstat
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) for the First Judicial Department has moved to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).
This court admitted respondent to practice on November 8, 1982.
A certified copy of the disposition has been presented to this court (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b]). Upon her conviction, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; see, Matter of Dizak, 93 AD2d 680, 681-682 [1st Dept 1983]).
Accordingly, the petition of the DDC should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Wallach, JJ., concur.
Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective May 19, 1987.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.