People v. Lipman
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find ample support in the record for the hearing court’s conclusion that exigent circumstances existed justifying the brief and limited initial search of the defendant’s apartment by the responding police officers (see, People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-178, cert denied 426 US 953; People v Cohen, 87 AD2d 77, 82-83, affd 58 NY2d 844, cert denied 461 US 930). We also find that the hearing court’s determination that the reentry into the apartment was consented to by the defendant’s wife is supported by the evidence. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.