Saffran v. Saffran
Opinion of the Court
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated September 30, 1977, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), dated April 16, 1986, which denied his application for a downward modification of alimony upon determining that the parties’ separation agreement as amended did not merge with the judgment of divorce but survived independently.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
This appeal arises out of the denial of the plaintiff husband’s motion for a downward modification of alimony. The parties entered into a separation agreement in 1971 wherein
We concur with the determination by Special Term that at the time the stipulation was entered into, the parties intended that it would be incorporated in but survive the judgment of divorce (see, Jensen v Jensen, 110 AD2d 679).
In any event, under Domestic Relations Law § 236 (A), which is controlling in this case (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]), the husband was required to demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances in order to warrant a modification of the alimony provisions of the divorce judgment (see, e.g., De Paolo v De Paolo, 104 AD2d 631). The record supports Special Term’s finding that the husband failed to make such a showing. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.