Catherwood v. American Sterilizer Co.
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We conclude that plaintiff’s failure to serve the complaint until nine days after it was due was not law office failure under the circumstances of this case (cf., Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904, 905). Consequently, there being a sufficient indication of merit and no prejudice to defendant, it was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint (see, Donnelly v Pepicelli, 58 NY2d 268; Barasch v Micucci, 49
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.