Metzger v. Metzger
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law, with costs and matter transferred to Monroe County Family Court
The motion to modify the Family Court order should have been presented to Judge Bonadio (CPLR 2221). We conclude, however, that Supreme Court had jurisdiction to transfer the motion to Judge Bonadio and that its failure to do so was error. The divorce decree was silent regarding future enforcement or modification of its provisions. As a consequence, Supreme Court and Family Court had equal power to entertain motions for modification of the custody and visitation portions of the decree (see, Family Ct Act § 652 [b]). Supreme Court was, therefore, obligated to transfer the motion to Judge Bonadio pursuant to CPLR 2221. We exercise our review powers to transfer plaintiff’s motion to Judge Bonadio (see, CPLR 5501, 5522; Lipkis v Pikus, 64 NY2d 830).
We agree with plaintiff’s contention that a plenary hearing is necessary before the motion to modify the visitation provisions of the Family Court order can be resolved (Allen v Kriesel, 87 AD2d 992; see also, Bayne v Roberts, 112 AD2d 775; Matter of Ferro v Ferro, 91 AD2d 1205). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cicoria, J.—visitation.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.