Manning v. Manning
Manning v. Manning
134 A.D.2d 842
Opinion of the Court
— Order affirmed without costs (see, Belling v Haugh’s Pools, 126 AD2d 958, Iv denied 70 NY2d 602). Green, Pine and Davis, JJ., concur. Callahan, J. P., and Denman, J., concur on constraint of Howard v Poseidon Pools ([appeal No. 1] 134 AD2d 926 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.