People v. Gedo
Opinion of the Court
On November 2, 1984, the defendant and a companion were discovered in a Getty gasoline station in Patchogue, New York, dismantling a stolen 1973 Oldsmobile. The transmission of the Oldsmobile was found in the bed of the defendant’s 1967 Dodge truck, while the Oldsmobile engine was in the process of being installed in the defendant’s daughter’s 1967 Chevrolet.
On appeal the defendant argues that the People failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the court did not properly apply the law regarding circumstantial evidence. We disagree.
In the instant case both direct and circumstantial evidence combined to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of possession of the stolen vehicle, and that he knew that it was stolen. In a case where both direct and circumstantial evidence are employed to demonstrate a defendant’s culpability, the standard that the facts perceived as a whole must exclude "to a moral certainty” every conclusion
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.