Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988

Bhatti v. Roche

Bhatti v. Roche
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 31, 1988
140 A.D.2d 660; 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020; 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125
Bhatti v. Roche

Opinion of the Court

"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should not be granted where there is any doubt about the existence of a triable issue of fact” (Sherman v Town of Rhinebeck, 133 AD2d 77, 78). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There exist triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants represented that the real property in question could be subdivided and whether, in fact, the real property in question may be subdivided. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.