Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988

Sienk v. Smolka

Sienk v. Smolka
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 944; 530 N.Y.S.2d 1014; 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14963
Sienk v. Smolka

Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term that plaintiff has failed to plead sufficient evidentiary facts to sustain an independent cause of action for fraud. The fraudu*945lent concealment alleged in the complaint is an element of plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice (see, Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442). (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.-dismiss cause of action.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.