People v. Muniz
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.), rendered March 11, 1987, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.
The sole issue on appeal is the propriety of sentencing defendant as a predicate felony offender. Defendant contends that neither of his New Jersey burglary convictions, upon which the People rely, qualifies as a predicate felony conviction because the underlying crime would not constitute a felony under New York law. The New Jersey burglary statute provides, in pertinent part,
"[a] person is guilty of burglary if, with purpose to commit an offense therein he:
"(1) [e]nters a structure * * * or
“(2) [surreptitiously remains in a structure * * * knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so.” (NJ Stat Annot § 2C:18-2 [a].)
Thus, the New Jersey burglary statute requires that the culpable conduct be accompanied by the intent to commit an “offense”, while Penal Law § 140.20, New York’s third degree burglary statute, requires an intent to commit a “crime”. Defendant argues that the element of intent in the New Jersey statute is defined in a way that it may not constitute felonious conduct in New York since an "offense” in New Jersey contemplates conduct which might be a mere violation in New York, whereas a “crime” in New York must be a felony or misdemeanor.
We do not find any such infirmity in the New Jersey statute, which provides that an offense “for which a sentence of imprisonment in excess of 6 months is authorized [to be] a crime within the meaning of the Constitution of this State.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.