Starr Block Co. v. Tedesco
Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the defendant appeals from a default judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.), dated August 17, 1987, which, upon his default in appearing for and after an inquest on the issue of damages, is in favor of the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed with costs.
Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate his default on the issue of liability. We agree with the court’s determination that the defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his default (see, Perellie v Crimson’s Rest., 108 AD2d 903). Moreover, the conclusory allegations in the defendant’s affidavit were insufficient to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious defense to the plaintiff’s action (see, Loeb v Tanenbaum, 124 AD2d 941; Terranova v Gallagher Truck Center, 121 AD2d 621).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.