In re Eden
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 19, 1969.
The petitioner herein served the respondent with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 informing him of his right to interpose certain enumerated defenses to the imposition of discipline in New York. By letter dated August 5, 1988, the’ respondent, through Florida counsel, submitted his verified response wherein he argued that the imposition of discipline in New York would be unjust. The respondent’s response failed, however, to make a "written demand for a hearing” as required by the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 691.3 [d]).
After viewing the Florida record and the respondent’s verified response, we find that the respondent was disbarred in Florida pursuant to his resignation and is guilty of professional misconduct warranting discipline in New York.
Accordingly, the respondent should be and hereby is disbarred and it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law effective immediately.
Mollmj, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Barry S. Eden is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.