Van Damme v. Axelrod
Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence in support of the Commissioner’s determination that petitioner, a nurse anesthetist, unlawfully obtained morphine during surgery on May 12, 1986 and failed to verify that he properly disposed of partial doses of morphine on 20 occasions between December 28, 1984 and May 31, 1985. Petitioner did not have the authority to administer morphine without a physician’s order (see, Public Health Law § 3331 [2]; § 3302 [28]). The evidence established that the doctor anesthesiologist did not authorize petitioner to obtain or administer the third vial of morphine sulphate at issue. No one observed petitioner administer the controlled substance to the patient and the hospital record does not indicate that a third dose was administered. Moreover, only two empty vials were found following surgery.
With respect to the improper disposal charge, the evidence established that on at least 20 occasions petitioner failed to obtain a witness’s signature or initials. Although the applicable regulation requires only the witness’s presence, not the
The $7,000 civil penalty imposed was not excessive given the serious and repetitive nature of the violations (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.