In re Silverstein
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
In this proceeding, the Special Referee sustained a charge of professional misconduct which alleged that the respondent had been Convicted of a "serious crime” in that, on October
Both the petitioner and the respondent move to confirm the report of the Special Referee.
We are in full agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The petitioner’s motion and the respondent’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee are granted.
In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we have taken into consideration the personal problems advanced by the respondent as well as other mitigating circumstances. Accordingly, the respondent is censured for his misconduct.
Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner’s motion and the respondent’s motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee are granted; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent Frank Silverstein is censured.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.