People v. Greene
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the prosecutor’s opening statement complied with CPL 260.30 (3) (see, People v Adams, 139 AD2d 794, 795; People v Parker, 97 AD2d 620, 621). Further, though there were defects in the prosecutor’s opening statement, they did not so prejudice defendant as to require a new trial (see,
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Darrigrand, J. — manslaughter, second degree; petit larceny.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.