Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989

Szafranski v. Priebe

Szafranski v. Priebe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 1003; 543 N.Y.S.2d 598; 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9940
Szafranski v. Priebe

Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: The court erred in precluding plaintiffs discovery of defendant’s karate manual. CPLR 3101 (a) provides, in pertinent part, "There shall be full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action”. That language is to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure of facts bearing on the controversy which will assist in preparation for trial. "The test is one of usefulness and reason” (Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403, 406). Plaintiff established that defendant’s karate manual is possibly relevant to prosecution of her personal injury action and thus "material and necessary” within the meaning of the statute. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — discovery.) Present —Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.