Home Mutual Insurance v. Preston
Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff insurance carrier appeals from an order granting summary judgment declaring that defendant and injured third parties are entitled to insurance coverage under a general liability policy and denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment declaring that no coverage exists for the losses complained of. The action stems from the insured’s assault upon four individuals resulting in severe injuries. Subsequently, the insured pleaded guilty to a number of criminal charges, including assault in the first and second degrees. Plaintiff bases its right to deny coverage upon its policy exclusion that precludes recovery for bodily injury "expected or intended by the insured” and upon defendant’s failure to give timely notice of the occurrence. Defendant responded by alleging facts which he contended justified the late notice (Insurance Law § 3420 [a] [4]) and countered with
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.