People v. Sullivan
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Ciccarello (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Fullwood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s assertions, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Although the defendant contends that the prosecution failed to prove the forcible compulsion element of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]), we find that the testimony of the victim and of a neighbor who had come to her aid sufficiently established the nonconsensual nature of the act.
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his challenge to the propriety of the sentence, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J. P., Eiber, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.