People v. Vega
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered August 6, 1986, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third
Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for an in camera hearing and report in accordance with the guidelines set forth in People v Darden (34 NY2d 177), and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim; the Supreme Court, Kings County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.
Our examination of the record reveals that, apart from the information received from the confidential informant, there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant. Therefore the trial court should have conducted an in camera inquiry in accordance with the guidelines set forth in People v Darden (supra; see also, People v Patti, 59 AD2d 949), and we remit the matter for such a hearing and report.
We reach no other issues at this juncture. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.