Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990

People v. Freeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 25, 1990

162 A.D.2d 704; 559 N.Y.S.2d 642; 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8162

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Kelly (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
People v. Freeman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
People v. Rivera (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Gooden (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Mason (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Andrews (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
People v. Comer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. McClain (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered June 29, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed

The defendant’s contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is not preserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission (see, CPL *705470.05 [2]; People v Wilkerson, 162 AD2d 568; People v Braithwaithe, 154 AD2d 543; People v Bey-Cruz, 152 AD2d 756; People v Jusino, 152 AD2d 744; cf., People v Nimmons, 72 NY2d 830); and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Wilkerson, supra; People v Mathis, 150 AD2d 613; People v Lugo, 150 AD2d 502; cf., People v Carballo, 158 AD2d 701).

The defendant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.