Davis v. Richardson
Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner did not raise any issue regarding the adequacy of prehearing assistance or denial of his right to call witnesses on his administrative appeal, and thus, those issues were not preserved for judicial review (see, Matter of Cushing-Gale v Kelly, 155 AD2d 996; Matter of Samuels v Kelly, 143 AD2d 506, lv
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.