People v. Sutliff
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.), ren
The People concede that defendant was not adequately informed of his right to challenge any statement regarding a predicate felony conviction as required by CPL 400.21. Due to this failure to comply with the statutory procedures for determining second felony offender status, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted for resentencing (see, People v Snyder, 105 AD2d 553).
Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for resentencing; and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.