Jemrock Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Opinion of the Court
Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered April 27, 1990,
Petitioner is the owner of 210 West 101st Street. Prior to April 1, 1984 the tenant of apartment 15E filed a rent overcharge complaint. DHCR directed the owner to roll back the rent by approximately $400 per month, and determined a refund was due the tenant of $33,817.57.
Petitioner’s request that this court overrule its determination in Matter of Lavanant v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal (148 AD2d 185) has been rejected numerous times and does not warrant serious consideration. (See, e.g., Matter of Jemrock Realty Co. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 166 AD2d 222.) Furthermore, DHCR’s processing of the tenant’s rent overcharge complaint as a fair market rent challenge was neither arbitrary nor capricious; the tenant, at the time she initially filed her papers, was unaware that she was the first rent-stabilized tenant. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.