In re Taub
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martyn Taub has submitted an affidavit dated July 11,1991, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Taub was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on December 18,1946.
Mr. Taub acknowledges that he is currently the subject of
Mr. Taub acknowledges that if charges were predicated upon the allegations pending against him, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits.
Mr. Taub indicates that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implication of submitting his resignation.
Counsel for the Grievance Committee recommends that the court accept the resignation. Under the circumstances herein, the resignation of Martyn Taub as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, Martyn Taub is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the resignation of Martyn Taub is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Martyn Taub is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that Martyn Taub shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Martyn Taub is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.