People v. Simpson
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, we find that the record provides an ample basis for a rational trier of fact to determine that defendant was the person who committed the burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. (See, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620.) However, with respect to defendant’s convictions for grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, it appears that the People failed to prove that the value of the property stolen was in excess of $3,000 in accordance with Penal Law § 155.20. [The unpublished decision and order of this Court entered May 7, 1991 is recalled and vacated.] Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.