Lindner v. City of Buffalo
Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly charged the jury that any negligence of defendant Lester Bradley in causing the first accident could not be considered a proximate cause of decedent’s injuries sustained as a result of the second accident (see, Osowicki v Engert, 85 AD2d 778, lv denied 55 NY2d 608; Stanton v Clegg, 278 App Div 486; Gralton v Oliver, 277 App Div 449, affd 302 NY 864). Further, we conclude that the jury’s finding, that defendant Lester Bradley’s negligence in leaving the scene of the first accident was not a proximate
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.