Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991

McClure v. McClure

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 30, 1991

176 A.D.2d 325; 574 N.Y.S.2d 523; 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12345

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

Levande v. Levande (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Matter of Solomon v. Fishman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
In re Max F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
Perez v. Sepulveda (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
Nancy C. v. Alison C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
In re Jazmone S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
Melikishvili v. Grigolava (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
In re Virginia P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
Cooper-Winfield v. Gary (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
Schreiber v. Schreiber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Naffa v. Naffa (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Stillway v. Guzewicz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
Greene v. Greene (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
Bart v. Bart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
Joseph v. Joseph (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
Kelly v. Connors (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
Brown v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

— In a family offense proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Tejada, J.), dated January 12, 1990, which, after a hearing, directed the appellant not to assault, menace, harass or reck*326lessly endanger the petitioner and excluded the appellant from the home of the petitioner until January 12, 1991.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In this case, the order of protection has expired, and determination of this appeal would have no direct effect on the parties. Further, we find that the issuance of an order of protection in this case did not constitute a "permanent and significant stigma” which might indirectly affect the appellant’s status in potential future proceedings (cf., Matter of H. Children, 156 AD2d 520). Thus, the appeal is dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444; Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg, 127 AD2d 766). Harwood, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.