People v. Sturgis
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized from his car during the execution of a search warrant. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the warrant application satisfied the Aguilar-Spinelli test for probable cause (see, Spinelli v United States, 393 US 410; Aguilar v Texas, 378 US 108; People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549). The applicant’s general statement that the informant’s reliability had been demonstrated in the past together with police confirmation of information supplied by the informant established the reliability of the informant (see, People v Rodriguez, 52 NY2d 483, 489; People v Backenstross, 73 AD2d 796). In addition, the details supplied by the informant were explicit and extensive enough to warrant the inference that such information was based upon the informant’s personal knowledge (see, People v Rodriguez, supra, at 493; People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231, 241-242).
There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the evi
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.