Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992

People v. Oritz

People v. Oritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 16, 1992
179 A.D.2d 470
People v. Oritz

Opinion of the Court

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly *471harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.